Saturday 19 December 2015

Star Wars Episode 7: The Force Awakens


Spoilers ahead!

It's hard to believe it's been 32 years since Return of the Jedi. I was 3 years old and probably didn't see it until a Christmas or two later on the television (they knew how to keep you waiting back then)!

In the time since we've had Episodes 1 - 3. Three much-maligned episodes which were deemed inferior to George Lucas' original trilogy. For what it's worth, I like them. Even Attack of the Clones (my least favourite) has a few good things going for it.
The way the Emperor manipulated and ultimately overthrew the galaxy was a master-stroke. So too was the immaculate design and fabrication of everything in that time. One need only look at our own history to see what George was going for there (think the 1940's and 50's - then look at the years since, which has seen mass-production and mediocrity rule).
There's two very good films in those first three episodes. Much could've been jettisoned, leaving room for a further feature, set between Episodes 3 and 4 (who didn't want to see the young Darth Vader in action)!
Oh yeah, and regarding current theory - that which Jar Jar Binks is in fact a Sith Lord - it's doubtful, but I would've welcomed it. The theories are fun and utterly convincing!

The greatest element missing from those first three episodes is a lightness of touch. Some joy to go hand in hand with it's sense of adventure. Despite it's more serious notes, A New HopeEmpire and Jedi were a lot of fun - why risk so much if there's no joy or fun to be had in your world?
I would say this is the defining attribute of The Force Awakens. There is spectacle a plenty, but the film also delivers quite a few laughs!

One particular scene in The Force Awakens returns us to these previous sensibilities and confirms J.J. Abrams as the right choice as director.
Finn and Rey (our two, young new heroes) share a terrific moment together in the Millennium Falcon, after they've outrun their pursuers. They're elated, almost hugging one another - thrilled to be alive and complementing one another on their actions. The audience has been with them up until this point of course - and the jubilation is infectious!
Many other exchanges are made throughout The Force Awakens, making the film lively and energetic.
Abrams has given his actors plenty of physical creations to act against too. Understandably, if there's nothing for an actor to act against they should, by all accounts be able to "act". Yet The Force Awakens proves there's no substitute for physical sets and characters alike.

The story of The Force Awakens sees General Leia Organa (Carrie Fisher) leading the Resistance against new threat, the First Order. Desperate for her brothers help, she seeks possession of a map to Lukes whereabouts - with the help of famed Resistance pilot, Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac). Helping Poe is former Stormtrooper, Finn (John Boyega) and scavenger-come-pilot, Rey (Daisy Ridley).
The First Order are lead by Supreme Leader Snoke (Andy Serkis), General Hux (Domhnall Gleeson) and the mysterious Kylo Ren (Adam Driver). With a planet-sized Death Star at their disposal, the First Order mean to finish what the Emperor started - by any means!
Han Solo and Chewbacca come to the aid of the Resistance of course - as the force awakens throughout the galaxy and within our group of heroes!

The Force Awakens is a terrific cinematic experience. Abrams and his cast and crew have successfully tapped into what made Lucas' original trilogy so enthralling.
The Force Awakens is nostalgic, but it doesn't rest on this attribute alone. It's a wholly captivating affair, exuding emotion at every turn. There are purposeful beats to mirror adventures past, but they are subtly done - with the emphasis on the future rather than the past.
Not a bum-note in site, the only real repetition occurs when the Starkiller Base is revealed (the Mega-Death Star). But really, if you're plan is to destroy moons and planets, you're probably gonna need something of that magnitude! Some may also argue that too many coincidences occur. But then these films are about a spiritual force which binds the galaxy together. The Star Wars mythos revolves around fate and destiny, prompting that which will occur has already been written!

We are promised at least five more films, to be released in consecutive years; Episodes 8 and 9 and three spin-off tales - beginning with Rogue One next year. A host of fabulous talent are driving these adventures, promising spectacle, integrity and a great deal more fun!
May the force by with you!

5/5


Poster image courtesy: http://www.cnet.com


Wanted to add this poster also - one of the best alternative posters out there, by famed comic-book artist Phil Noto

Wednesday 2 December 2015

Creed


Directed by Ryan Coogler (Fruitvale Station), Creed is the first official Rocky spin-off.
It tells the story of Adonis Johnson, Apollo Creeds illegitimate son - his life and rise to notoriety as a boxer.

Having spent several years in foster homes and juvenile facilities, Johnson is visited by Apollos widowed wife, Mary Anne. Mary Anne claims custody of Johnson and raises him as her own, in the privileged lifestyle left to them by his father.
Fast forward 17 years and Johnson is working for a reputable security firm. Outside of work hours however, Johnson is moonlighting as a boxer - playing numerous fights south of the L.A. border in Mexico. Having secured 16 knock-outs, Johnson sets about making a career of the sport - and his passion. Much to the disappointment of Mary Anne, who lost her husband in the ring, Johnson sets off to Philadelphia - home of some of the best boxers in the world, including Rocky Balboa!
Keen to make it under his own steam, Johnson refuses to go by his fathers name to win respect. His legacy is soon discovered however, meaning Johnson must come to terms with his fathers absence, his legacy and name. Thankfully he has Rocky in his corner!

Creed is a great, great film! Like the best Rocky films, it's gritty and supplies its leads with rich character arcs. It also has positivity oozing from every sweaty pore! 
Stallone has handed the creative reigns over to Coogler, who must be a fan of the original series (who isn't)?! 
Coogler gets Rocky; from the stunning choreography of the boxing matches and the under-dog sensibilities, to the rich characterisation and exquisite use of music - which in all honesty, should make you stand-up and punch the air!
Just as Stallone did it before him, Coogler utilises the nuances of his characters surroundings also - particularly the town of Philadelphia. Coogler understands that Philly is and always has been one of Rockys greatest co-stars!

Creed is without question an under-dog story, staying close to the formula of each and every Rocky film before it. Audiences may scoff at this, thinking they've seen it all before. However in this day and age one can't put a price on positivity - and Creed is genuinely positive and uplifting. 
Despite a few minor contrivances (the mid-section of the series), each Rocky film has explored different aspects and eras of Rocky and his cast of supporting characters. In Rocky Balboa, Stallone explored the retired sports star, learning to except the loss of those closest to him. In Creed Johnson is unable to escape his fate, despite his wealth and privilege. Johnson has to except the loss of someone early-on in his life and further explore the benefits of his birth-right, beyond wealth and what society seems fit to determine. Fundamentally Rocky is the average Joe who made good - happy to live out his golden years in humble surrounds. Rocky is a human story, meaning everyone can relate to him, little or much - and this extends to Creed.

Michael B. Jordan is terrific as Johnson/Creed. Coogler obviously recognises a talent when he sees one, having cast Jordon in his feature-film debut. Jordon comes close to matching Stallones physicality in this film - and shows great emotional depth to boot!
Taking a back-seat creatively, Stallone adds a lifetimes worth of expertise and experience as the infamous Rocky Balboa. Like 2006's Rocky Balboa, Stallone unearths even more depths to his creation. Come awards season it'll be friggin' awesome to see him pick-up a statue or several!

Creed is one of the few spin-off movies which actually works. Proving there's no substitute for a good script and great characterisation, Creed does the unimaginable and makes you care deeply for its mythos - and the make-believe characters who pass through it.
The Rocky saga is in safe hands with this particular team - and further adventures would be most welcome. Film of the year so far!

5/5


Poster image courtesy: http://www.shockya.com

Monday 16 November 2015

Sicario, The Martian and Crimson Peak


Sicario is the new film from Denis Villeneuve, director of Prisoners and Enemy. Villeneuve has risen quickly to the ranks of directors to watch. Establishing himself as a supreme visualist, Villeneuve has proven he can orchestrate both independent and commercial projects with aplomb.
Like Prisoners, Sicario sides on the commercial - with a host of A-list stars to it's name and a topical subject matter.

Sicario is a film about the illegal drugs industry in the Americas and the borders by which they cross. The film further explores the drug-lords who keep everyone in check using fear and violence.
The film plays out through the eyes of Kate Macer (Emily Blunt). Macer is a hostage crisis negotiator. Early on in proceedings macer and her team discover a bloody scene in Arizona - perpetrated by the criminal element of the drugs industry, but commanded by the drug-lords housed far from the front lines.
Enter Matt Graver (Josh Brolin) and his team. Graver works in the cloak and dagger world of higher government - working alongside those who know their part in the plan, but not necessarily the plan itself.
Macer and her partner Wayne (Daniel Kaluuya) are given an opportunity to join Gravers team with a promise of instigating change, rather than being the ones left to clear-up.
Macer is kept very much in the dark throughout proceedings - told only what she needs to know at any given time. This is a bold move on the part of the film-makers, as the audience are left scratching their heads a long way into the film. We only know what Macer discovers. Slowly but surely the grand operation is revealed - a solid and breakthrough answer to the drug problem, yet morally reprehensible.

Sicario is a serious film about a serious subject matter. It doesn't profess to have all the answers, but the answers it does give are responsibly adult and fundamentally real-world.
Sicario looks amazing! Villeneuve and cinematographer Roger Deakins have used multiple cameras to capture every angle of the action. This technique ratchets-up the tension, as you're never sure where the next beat of violence is going to come from. There are numerous shots which will stay long in the memory also. Scenes with minimal dialogue, which say so much on account of the shifts in light and shade - tonal shifts which paint thousand-word pictures.

The three principle actors triumph in their distinctive roles. After action roles in Looper and Edge of Tomorrow, Blunt utterly convinces as an elite, squad leader She further displays an element of vulnerability behind the shroud of confident leader. Blunt goes on the bigger journey here - learning more and more about the games governments play at an untouchable level. Brolin has the laid-back but ready for action type down to a T. Given carte blanche to do whatever is necessary, Graver seemingly takes it all in his stride. Benicio Del Toro is equally good as Gravers right-hand and suitably shady Alejandro. Del Toro goes on quite a journey also. Like Graver, Alejandro is a well-worn soldier with numerous skeletons in his closet. Keen to exorcise his demons, Alejandro is relentless in acquiring knowledge and seeking retribution.

Sicario is a tense, fictionalised tale, set in the all-too-real world of the illegal drugs industry. Using independent sensibilities, Villeneuve and company have gifted us with a film which requires us to pay attention - filling in the necessary blanks just as Macer does. Thankfully Sicario doesn't spoon-feed us with answers from the get-go. An unexpected treat!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://www.fatmovieguy.com



The Martian came very close to being a  five-star film for me. I was about ready to stand-up and cheer as the closing credits rolled (lets take a leaf out of the Americans and do this more often people)!
Based on the incredibly popular book of the same name, The Martian tells the story of Mark Watney (Matt Damon). An astronaut, presumed dead, left to survive by his own hand and intellect on Mars!

The Martian is science fiction by way of survival documentary. Not quite Bear Grylls. More intellectual - the science of botany et al. If this sounds boring then get ready to be surprised!
Directed with incredible visual and technical flare by the never comparable Ridley Scott, The Martian looks fabulous and feels very real. With Dariusz Wolski at the lens, The Martian effortlessly transports us to formerly unexplored terrain.

After the crew of the Hermes evade a potential life-threatening storm on Mars, astronaut Mark Watney awakes the next day to find himself stranded and skewed by a communications antenna. Patching himself up and realising the enormity of what faces him, Watney decides to act - making a vow to himself that his current predicament will not cost him his life.
Being a botanist first and foremost, Watney sets about growing some food to aid in his rationing. With knowledge of the next manned mission to hand, he plans an exploration to the arrival site. A treacherous trip requiring Watney to frequently recharge the battery in his vehicle using solar power. Numerous other events unfold - all meticulously planned by Watney.

The science behind The Martian gives the film considerable weight. It may not be understood by all - and hell, it may not even be entirely accurate. But it all seems feasible - given more credence by the always affable and cock-sure Matt Damon!
The Martian isn't just a one-man show however. NASA is notified of the demise of Watney, yet begins to notice discrepancies in the satellite images from Mars being beamed back to Earth. Once Watney is discovered to be alive, a highly skilled and passionate team of operatives is formed in an effort to aid Watney in his plight.
A terrific ensemble has been gathered for the other half of The Martian. Jeff Daniels plays head of NASA, Teddy Sanders. Leading the Mars missions is Chiwetel Ejiofor, as Vincent Kapoor and beneath him is a host of fantastic character actors including; Sean Bean, Donald Glover and Benedict Wong. 
The Earthbound crew add much to proceedings also. Jessica Chastain and Michael Pena lead the Hermes crew as Melissa Lewis and Rick Martinez respectively. Their own journey begins with immeasurable guilt - followed by immeasurable guilt, as they discover their dead comrade is actually alive!

Like Apollo 13 before it, The Martian begins as science exploration and quickly becomes human survival pic. In an effort to assist Watney, tech exploration and various exercises are conducted on the ground in Houston, before Watney puts them to action on Mars. Again like Apollo 13, these plans are somewhat beholden to what Watney has at his disposal. Given it's the not-too-distant future The Martian offers more tech at Watneys disposal, but the principles remains the same. The DIY approach is still palpable of course - and offers the audience a thrilling and uplifting journey.

A purposely awkward action sequence at the end could've benefited from some nicely judged sound design, or absence there of. A disorientating feel to Watneys grasping at fate would've been perfect, had we remained with his POV. Sure the movie ultimately projects a group effort, but it's Watneys last ditch attempt in the end.
Despite Watneys efforts, The Martian does hammer home a considerable message. As is clear in The Martians not-too-distant future, we should be looking to the stars with more clarity and intent - in awe and proud of the positive advances we've made as a race!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://imadformovies.blogspot.com.au

In my search for posters I came across this illustration by Matt Taylor. I do believe this accompanied an article on the book however - a little before the movie was released. This illustrator is amazing though. Do check out his work!




Crimson Peak is the new film from Guillermo del Toro - director of Pans Labyrinth and Hellboy. A native of Mexico, del Toro has split his film-making career between films in his native tongue and more commercial Hollywood fare. Having had considerable success, both commercially and critically, del Toro appears to have embraced his new standing and produced a film which straddles the line between independent and commercial film-making. Crimson Peak may not be born of Spanish tongue, but tonally it ventures closer to the likes of The Devils Backbone and Pans Labyrinth then it does Pacific Rim.

The actors he's chosen here may be popular also, but all have shown great depth and versatility in the roles they've previously embodied. 
Aesthetically del Toro goes from strength to strength. He has a unique visual voice - a signature style. Watching Crimson Peak, it's undeniable who's behind the camera. Interestingly long-time collaborator Guillermo Navarro has been replaced by Dan Laustsen behind the lens. This goes some way to exploring the collaborative nature of film. Del Toro knows what he wants - employing those who can achieve his particular vision.
The set-design here is breathtaking! Del Toro appears old-school in his practises, employing the use of physical craftsmanship over green screen and digital technology. To be on one of del Toros sets must be truly wondrous I imagine!

The plot of Crimson Peak is old-school too, both in it's themes and narrative. Mia Wasikowska plays Edith Cushing, daughter of local businessman Carter Cushing. Having been traumatised at a young age by the passing of her mother, Edith has spent much of her time basking in literature - honing her skills as a writer of fiction. Transfixed by a ghostly sighting shortly after her mothers passing, Edith has since leant towards stories of a similar concern. Besotted with her father, Edith intends to get published in the male-dominated world of 1901.
Enter Thomas and Lucille Sharpe (Tom Hiddleston and Jessica Chastain), a brother and sister team looking for financial assistance from Mr Cushing, in an effort to mine the clay from which they reside. Thomas is charming but out of his depth, despite his entrepreneurial spirit.
Catching the eye of Edith, Thomas makes a play for her hand. This move is encouraged by Lucille, as a means to get Mr Cushing onside, yet the fearless Thomas appears genuine in his affections.
Cushing sends the pair packing of course - outraged by their manipulative behaviour.
The heart gets what the heart wants however and soon Edith and Thomas are wed. Edith is whisked away to the ominous sounding Crimson Peak where Thomas and his sister reside.
It's at this point we're introduced to the star of the show, Allerdale Hall - the manor which sits a top of Crimson Peak, in all it's decaying glory.

Crimson Peak is a mystery above all else. And watching the mystery unravel is at times both bewildering and intoxicating. This is a classically told fable where nothing is what it seems.
Don't expect a game changer with Crimson Peak. Instead consider this a tall tale, told by a master story-teller!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://mondotees.com

Illustration by Daniel Danger. Another great illustrator. This guy uses a lot of architecture in his work - and it's something else!

Thursday 6 August 2015

Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation


So after two third sequels were released in short succession this year (Mad Max and Jurassic World), we now have two forth sequels released (Terminator and Mission Impossible), just a few weeks apart. A meaningless pattern, given meaning by us film-fanatics alone (or is that just me again)?!

Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation is brought to us by Tom Cruise, J.J. Abrams (producing partner since MI:3) and new writer/director, Christopher McQuarrie. McQuarrie is known widely for writing The Usual Suspects. McQuarrie took a brief hiatus after directing his first feature, The Way of the Gun, but now appears to be gaining momentum again with the likes of Jack Reacher and now Mission Impossible.
McQuarries skills are evident early-on. After an early jaw-dropping action scene, we are transported into a high-class espionage thriller. A movie which allows for spectacle, but not at the expense of story and plot. The action is beautifully choreographed, allowing for character forming/defining moments of respite and the opportunity to engage with other players in different parts of the world. In many ways McQuarrie and Cruise have returned to the noirish routes of the first film - directed with aplomb by the very noirish De Palma. Recalling the likes of early Bond and other spy classics, Rogue Nation is skilfully paced, despite the ADD approach many a contemporary action film takes.

Cruise is awesome! Insisting on physical stunt-work over CG, he puts the audience in the thick of the action. Intent on doing much of the stunt-work himself, he awards the audience with an unforgettable hero who frequently puts himself in harms way. The sustained realism throughout the Mission Impossible series continues to impress - leaving us to gasp, wince and hold our collective breaths time and again (you'll be doing this a lot in this instalment)!

The story this time recalls the events of Ghost Protocol (MI:4) - and the destruction caused by the IMF team in Moscow particularly. Head CIA honcho Alan Hunley (Alex Baldwin) wants the IMF dissolved as a result, bringing his case to the likes of the US Senate.
Meanwhile Hunt is busying himself with the Syndicate - a secret (some believe phantom) organisation intent on global terrorism. Without any concrete evidence suggesting the legitimism of the Syndicate, Hunt is alone in his quest - save for new recruit William Brandt (Jeremy Renner). Brandt is the IMF liaison in the US, under scrutiny form Hunley and the CIA. As the abolishment of the IMF by the CIA ticks swiftly by, Brandt keeps Hunt abreast of proceedings.
As a wanted agent living in obscurity, Hunt seeks out additional help in the form of Luther Stickell (Ving Rhames) and Benji Dunn (Simon Pegg). Also on hand is possible ally, Ilsa Faust (Rebecca Ferguson). Ferguson is quite a find! As Ilsa she is both the physical and intellectual match to Cruise's Hunt. An English agent in deep-cover, Ilsa is a femme fatale of sorts, unsure of where her allegiances should lay.

The Mission Impossible films continue to impress. Like the Bond films, they employ a new creative team with each instalment (certainly a new director each time).
Despite being one of the most successful, MI:2 is generally regarded as the runt of the litter. It's a lesser Mission Impossible film for sure - relying too heavily on exposition and rubber masks! It still has moments of flare however. The last 20 minutes of breathless, non-stop action repairs much of the damage.
As a huge De Palma fan MI:1 is still my favourite - the rest of the series a close second. And yes, despite coming to it's defence, MI:2 would probably rank third!

Cruise and his team are onto a good thing here, with no signs of slowing down. Apparently MI:6 has already been green-lit (I imagine they'll be further exploring the British contingent in this one surely?)!
A few last points. Lets continue to bring new players into the fold - expanding the team, utilising the talents of key members when the opportunity strikes. I'd also like to see them continue to reference the other films in the series. MI:4 and MI:5 have done this really well - a few subtle nods giving the overall series a sense of grandeur. More please!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: https://www.breweryarts.co.uk

Wednesday 5 August 2015

Ant-Man


Ant-Man arrives after a lengthy gestation (around 8 years), ending in the departure of it's leading creative force, Edgar Wright. Along with writing partner Joe Cornish (Attack the Block), Wright developed the film for many years - long before Marvel retained the rights to bring it to theatres.
With Wright attached Ant-Man was a must-see! Even the strangely bleak At Worlds End would not have stopped film-fans arriving in their droves come opening weekend. With Ant-Man Wright was set to weave his magic with the likes of the Marvel-verse - a creative power-house which continues to grow and evolve.

The thinking is that perhaps Wrights vision was a little too left-of-centre for the likes of Marvel. Just as it is with the comics, Marvel have their way of doing things - which I guess distinguishes them from the pack.
Unlike many of the directors Marvel have employed to date, Wright is a visualist of considerable flare. Using the comics analogy once more, perhaps Wrights vision was more akin to an Image book, or even an Oni Press one (see: Scott Pilgrim vs. The World)!

Wright's a great writer too however - and this is something Marvel were undoubtedly impressed by. Marvel are the house of ideas after-all (or is that Disney - well, they're all under the same roof now anyway)! And history has proven that good ideas and a knack for humour is a prerequisite for their movie out-put thus far!

Anyway, Wright departed and in stepped Paul Rudd and his writing partner Adam McKay (Anchorman). Collectively they've turned Wrights 1960's picture into a contemporary one - moving the focus from original Ant-Man, Hank Pym to the later incarnation of Scott Lang.
Peyton Reed (Down with Love) stepped into the directors chair with the undesirable task of bringing all the aforementioned elements to the screen.
I'm happy to report that along with Marvel, Reed has respectfully shone the proverbial light on each collaborative partner. Reed has done so seamlessly of course, but it's fun to ponder which creative mind brought what to proceedings?!

So, who are Hank Pym and Scott Lang? Well, Hank Pym is a highly revered character within the Marvel universe. Along with Howard Stark and Nick Fury, Hank Pym laid the foundations for SHIELD and the Avengers back in the 1960's. Pym was the original Ant-Man of course, although in this iteration he is keen to pass the heavy mantle onto another.
Enter Scott Lang, an unlucky do-gooder who landed himself in jail as a result of a Robin Hood-style, anarchic crime. Divorced, but with a daughter to provide for, Lang agrees to help Pym in the hope he can make amends for his past indiscretions.

Having long since retired and in the process of relinquishing control of his company, Hank Pym is out, but still conscientious of people following his work.
One such ignoramus is Darren Cross - Pyms original protege, standing on the precipice of discovery. Cross is giddy with possibility, unaware that he's endangering the world with his own shrinking device.
Collectively Pym and Lang (along with Pyms daughter Hope) decide to act. In an elaborate plan they hope to stop Cross in his tracks - retrieving his designs, whilst making sure no one will follow his work.

Paul Rudd plays Scott Lang - the most unlikely choice for a super-hero since Seth Rogen donned the Green Hornet mask. Lang is an unlikely hero from the get-go however - and Rudd effortlessly convinces! Joining Rudd is Evangeline Lilly as Hope. And Michael Pina provides excellent support (gaining most of the laughs to boot) as Langs best friend, Luis.
In the role of Hank Pym is the great Michael Douglas - adding much needed gravitas to Pyms father/mentor figure.
Keep an eye out for a younger Douglas during a sequence set in the late 1980's. Along with Arnies younger self in this years Terminator, the young Hank Pym is an effectively rendered marvel to behold! A process of de-ageing this time (as opposed to Arnies full make-over). This sequence is no-less a triumph. Many have theorised of a 60's/70's-set Marvel adventure featuring the likes of Sam Jackson (Fury), Robert Redford (Pierce) and Michael Douglas (Pym). On this evidence at least, it's a project worth salivating over!

Peyton Reed, his cast and crew have successfully brought a heavily scrutinized vision to the screen. Ant-Man is far better than anticipated! A stand-alone origin tale that ties nicely into the Marvel cinematic universe. It's funny, action-packed and visually very exciting (the macro-photography is worth the price of admission alone)!
It would appear the scepticism was unfounded - as Marvel continue to impress. Was there ever any doubt?!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://screenrant.com

Terminator: Genisys


Terminator: Genisys is the fifth film in the Terminator series. Largely ignoring events from films 3 and 4, Genisys begins the Terminator story a-new - recounting events from the first film, then plunging us into a series of alternative time lines.

Beginning with the adult John Connor sending Kyle Reese back in time (as per the original Terminator), the film begins with a brief glimpse of the future, before transporting us back to 1984. What follows are some lovingly recreated scenes from the original Cameron film, before a time-travelling curve-ball is thrown, sending the likes of Kyle Reese and Sarah Connor on a new path.

It would appear the machines are wise to the events of the first two Terminator movies - sending a T1000 back to kill Sarah Connor as a child. The resistance have gone one better in this instalment, sending a guardian Terminator back to rescue the very young Sarah, keeping her safe over the intervening years.
Consequently Kyle Reese is thrust into a 1984 where Sarah is fully adept at holding her own. With a father-like Terminator in toe, she is fully capable of protecting both herself and Reese - even with another T1000 in hot pursuit!
Sounds convoluted I know - and it is, but to their credit the film-makers have made events relatively easy to follow.
The director this time is Alan Taylor, veteran of numerous television shows, from Bored to Death and Mad Men to Game of Thrones. Of the few features he's directed Thor: The Dark World is his most recent. A lesser Marvel movie perhaps but no less a notable entrance to the grand stage!

Replacing Linda Hamilton in the role of Sarah Connor is Emilia Clarke. Clarke is suitably fresh-faced as the 1984 Sarah Connor. She's spunky and fully adept in her slightly skewed new role. Time will tell how militant and muscular she becomes in future instalments?!
Replacing Michael Biehn in the role of Kyle Reese is Jai Courtney. Courtney impresses with an american accent(!) but he lacks all the important criteria which the character of Reese previously embodied. Courtney is a buff, super-hero type - not a sinewy, under-nourished survivor of the apocalypse?!
Jason Clarke (no relation to Emilia) plays the coveted role of John Connor. He has proven himself as a gruff, confident leader in the likes of Zero Dark Thirty and Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. Here he gets to hone these characteristics and more!
Of course the one constant which continues to hold all these films together is Schwarzenegger! He's as watchable as ever (particularly as we venture further from Camerons originals).

The major downfall with a lot of these films is the tendency to skew younger with each subsequent entry. Genisys is no different. The gore and violence is at a minimum and Arnies new (old) Terminator falls on his comedic attributes once too often - that damn grin for example! What was once hilarious in T2 becomes cringe-worthy by the end of Genisys, simply as a result of over-use.

Genisys has a few key ingredients going for it however. The altered time-lines and frequent use of time-travel is a bold move which generally pays off. Even one or two underdeveloped sequences give credence to the promise of a sequel, allowing for further explanation and revelation.
Genisys (the word from which the title comes) is a digital application which will ultimately spark Skynet. This is a contemporary notion which looks increasingly likely in our time - an application which links all of our digital devices together!
Like the first Terminator, Genisys is predicting our own future with some certainty. Surely it's evident to everyone that artificial intelligence will almost certainly turn against us?!!
Arnies ageing Terminator is a master-stroke also. I believe in T2 he informs the young John Connor of his 100- year lifespan. It surely stands to reason that his organic shell would age like everyone else.
This is a great example of Hollywood thinking outside the box also. Arnie, along with many other older actors are still evidently bankable. Lets give these actors age-appropriate roles, rather than humiliate them with make-up and the like. Stop torturing them with the only other logical (in Hollywood terms) alternative - botox and plastic surgery (YUK)!

Speaking of de-ageing, Genisys is the first movie I've seen to successfully replicate an actor digitally - specifically a younger incarnation of themselves. Now, obviously we don't want computers replacing actors, but this kind of technology (used wisely) opens the doors thematically for prequels, flashbacks and heavily manipulated characters.
The aforementioned scene is short, but it's hugely impressive. A combination of techniques I'm sure (body doubles and manipulation of old footage no doubt), but no less a jaw-dropping moment in movie history!
Genisys has one other weapon in it's arsenal, which the marketers of this movie felt inclined to divulge early on. It's an integral part of the movie which I won't go into here. Interestingly this marketing faux pas echoes the logic of the movie. Genisys has a lot going for it, but it spoils itself with mediocrity (a helicopter chase recalls the CG mastery of Schumachers Batman films).

Certainly it's attributes make Genisys worth a look. The first in a planned trilogy, it'll be interesting to see how this first instalment plays with others. Evidently the Terminator will be back!

3/5


Poster image courtesy: http://movies.mxdwn.com

Thursday 30 July 2015

Inside Out


Inside Out is the new Pixar film, directed by Pete Docter. Docters previous Pixar film was Up - one of Pixars most emotional films to date. Any fan will tell you, the opening 10-15 minutes of Up is a feat unto itself. A dialogue free, emotionally resonant tale of a married couple growing old together - truly exquisite!
Coincidentally Inside Out is a film all about emotions - emotions characterised as colourful beings within our mind.
The trailers and spots for Inside Out were fun, but I wasn't wholly convinced. This film appeared to be skewing quite young. On the surface of course, every Pixar film could be approached this way. On reflection however, most Pixar movies will leave you surprised, entertained and even educated!

Inside Out is no different. Eleven year-old Riley is the focus of Docters film and Rileys emotions are the driving force of this tale.
Amy Poehler leads this small group of characters as Joy. Essentially the leader of the group, Joy is joined by Sadness (Phyllis Smith), Disgust (Mindy Kaling), Anger (Lewis Black), and Fear (Bill Hader).
For years Joy has lead this dynamic quintet in relative harmony. The emotions are colour-coded and Rileys lasting memories are on view in their control centre for all to see. Of course the memories are predominately yellow - the colour of Joy!
Things are set to change however, as we join Riley during the first big upheaval in her life - a big move from the country to the city, on account of her fathers work.

We are subject to the misadventures of each emotion in Rileys mind. Running relatively smoothly at first, but then spiralling out of control.
The inquisitiveness of Sadness gets them all into trouble early on, then in an emotional meltdown of sorts, Joy and Sadness are exiled for a time. The absence of these emotions are evident in Rileys life, as she goes through the motions of starting life afresh.
Joy and Sadness have always been separate entities in Rileys life, but in this adventure they must learn to work as a team!
Navigating the wasteland of long-forgotten memories, Joy and Sadness must return to the control centre in an effort to restore balance to Rileys life. Via abstract thought and the perilous islands of personality, Sadness and Joy must catch the (actual) train of thought, despite the sporadic nature of it's arrival/departure times!
All the aforementioned elements of Rileys mind are expertly realised. On hand to lead Joy and Sadness through Rileys mind is Bing Bong (Richard Kind) - Rileys imaginary friend from old. Perhaps now just another fading memory, but not without his attributes!
Rileys innocence is crumbling away. Along with the other emotions, Joy and Sadness must learn to coexist, even encouraging one another to take a turn at the controls, when the opportunity permits.

Inside Out is a very fine film by Docter - and a great addition to the Pixar stable. The lasting impression is just how incredibly clever it is! Inside Out has some of the best advice and life-lessons to come out of any film, animated or not.
Ultimately life is forever changing. We each experience the same core emotions as Riley (watch the core emotions alter in dynamism slightly within other people). Some obviously fair better at dealing with these emotions, than others.
What Inside Out does is explain to us why. Fundamentally our emotions can be at odds with one another, just as we can with our neighbour. Learn to coexist. Learn to be diplomatic and understanding. Understand no single entity has all the answers, but together - collectively they/we can achieve greatness! It's a great lesson in functionality - both singularly and as a group!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://insidetherockposterframe.blogspot.com.au

Found these other great posters during my search. Love the Asian take (Japanese/Chinese)?!

The Cronenberg-esque art by Jeff Victor is pretty awesome too!!







Friday 10 July 2015

Jurassic World


How about that - another forth entry to another beloved franchise, in almost as many weeks!
Brought to us by director Colin Trevorrow (Safety Not Guaranteed), Jurassic World returns us to the original island of Isla Nubar, where a fully functional park has been operating and welcoming visitors for a decade.

Playing almost like a marketing video, we accompany two young brothers to the park - from their flight to Costa Rica, via the official Jurassic World ferry to the park itself. Witnessing first-hand, just as they do, the thrill of arriving at their destination and the wondrous sights and sounds to behold. No time is wasted as the younger of the two siblings pulls his older brother from one exhibit to another.

This is a superb introduction to Jurassic World, as it feels like you're a visitor to the park yourself. No stone has been left unturned in bringing this park to life - the detail is immense!
Like any park or museum, Jurassic World forces it's visitors to explore and navigate the park themselves. At it's heart and primary point of contact are exhibits detailing the science and construction of the park, with many an interactive display to view. If you look carefully you'll find many of these exhibits have been sponsored by one investing corporation or another - contemporary and logical!
Shortly thereafter, many of the live attractions are over-burdened by visitors (as any living dinosaur exhibit would be). This causes the younger of the two brothers to shove and push his way to the front of each and every enthusiastic crowd.

Grey (Ty Simpkins - great!) and Zach (Nick Robinson - burdened with the roll of emotional adolescent!) are nephews of Claire (Bryce Dallas Howard) - a senior, park supervisor of Jurassic World. With their parents hammering out an amicable divorce back home, Claire is charged with taking care of the boys - taking their minds off more pressing matters with VIP access to the park.
Obviously single and with no family of her own, Claire instead hands care-taking duties over to her assistant.

Meanwhile, in an equally thrilling introduction, we're returned to the raptor pen! This time Owen (Chris Pratt) is chief raptor wrangler - making clear headway in actually communicating and to some degree, training raptors.
I believe there was some fear surrounding the "domestication" of the raptors in this entry. Taking a cue from an early draft of the script, Trevorrow has instead arrived at the next logical step in the evolution of Dinosaurs "in our time" - communication and training! After lions and tigers it makes sense that we'd give dinosaurs a go!!
Despite the park being established for ten years already, Owen and his team are only now just making some progress. With progress comes outside interest however. In this instance it's in the form of Ingen - former owners of the park, now seemingly military influenced?
Anyway, these early scenes of Owen and his team with the raptors are equally impressive - and prove clearly that the raptors are far from tame.

We then reach the crux of the movie. In an effort to increase visitation to the park and up the ante for new and returning guests, a new dinosaur has been engineered. The gene pool of said animal is classified (duh)?! The fully grown animal is behaving distinctly odd, resulting in Owen being called in to advise.

Jurassic World begins to fall apart at his point. Surely any and all decisions made in a dinosaur park would be heavily scrutinised. The day-to-day running of a park like this would involve a 24 hour steam of conciousness - with mandatory communication at every level?!

That aside, the inevitable escape of this tricky new animal (named Indominus Rex) is executed with verve and gusto! This beast has considerable attributes, not least is it's ability to camouflage itself - a particular highlight!
The Indominus Rex has been housed away from the park on the other side of the island. Having escaped, it spends the rest of the movie heading for heat signatures (it's form of vision) to prey upon. The most notable of which is the endless supply of white meat meandering around the hub of the park!

Ingen and it's lead representative at the park (Vincent D'Onofrio) see this as a perfect opportunity to test the raptors hunting capability, under the instruction of humans. As the park loses more and more control, the absurd prospect of releasing the raptors on the Imdominus Rex becomes more likely.

From here on in Jurassic World becomes a by-the-numbers monster movie, where the humans are all but disregarded. The impressive visual effects take precedence at this juncture, as the inevitable carnage unfolds.
Some may argue that the better monster movies out there follow this formula to great success - even the likes of the original Jurassic Park. Unfortunately Jurassic World lacks interesting characters to root for and dare I say it, even care for. The park is run by idiots predominately - people who should't even be in the industry, let alone a dinosaur-themed leisure attraction.
Jurassic Park was screwed by Dennis Nedry - a man of questionable morality, out for personal gain. Obviously no one wants to repeat a storyline, but there must be a better way of collapsing the integrity of the park, without relying on the lack of integrity within the parks management and staff?!

Films like this frustrate me more than anything. They have a built-in audience who ultimately represent a safety-net of sorts. It's so seldom that sequels get made with the same integrity as the originals which spark them.
You're never gonna please all the people, all the time - but I wish I could just get in there sometimes and; trim a scene there, add a component there! A Larry David quote springs to mind, "I'm not an inventor, I'm an improver"! Ultimately I'd only be improving it for myself of course. And on the evidence of the (financial) success of Jurassic World, it would appear nothing is wrong!!

3/5


Poster image courtesy: http://www.slashfilm.com

Friday 26 June 2015

Mad Max: Fury Road


This is the forth instalment in the Mad Max franchise, coming some 30 years after it's third entry, Beyond Thunderdome.
All four entries (including Fury Road) have been written and directed by Dr. George Miller. Miller is the star here - him and his production team. And it's heartening to see the series creator usher in it's forth entry.
Not having seen Thunderdome I am unable to confirm or deny any and all continuity threads. Suffice it to say, Fury Road works terrifically as a stand-alone adventure.

The film begins at the Citadel - a substantial rock formation housing a dwindling number of the wastelands inhabitants. The Citadel is run by Immortan Joe - a ruler who keeps his people in check by supplying their only source of water as he sees fit. High up in his chambers the only plant life for miles around thrives, as Joe lives in relative excess. Joe trades in gas (petroleum), using breast milk to barter with. Moreover Joe has surrounded himself with beautiful women, so they may bare him a strong human son. Years of inbreeding and exposure to the nuclear wasteland has resulted in oft-deformed men and women. They stay loyal to Joes cause, making up the vast majority of his army (known as the War Boys).

Miller paints this apocalyptic world in broad strokes. The detail is exquisite (high praise to the world-builders here)! However this opening is mere fuel for the two hour chase sequence set to follow.
Speaking of which, the plot finds Imperator Furiosa (Charlize Theron) heading out into the wasteland to make a gas transaction with a nearby town. Furiosa is a leading general in Joes army, entrusted to secure this deal. Rather than do as instructed, Furiosa is seen by the eyes of the Citadel to be driving elsewhere. Clearly defying her masters wishes, Joe sends a cavalcade of War Boys after Furiosa.

In the interim, Max (Tom Hardy) has been taken prisoner by Nux (Nicholas Hoult) - one such War Boy. Keen to prove his worth to Joe, Nux joins the outgoing war party, with Max in toe as his blood supply. Maxs blood is pure, unbridled by disease or mutation. His blood by definition gives the War Boys a kind of natural high.

And so the chase begins, with Max an unwilling participant! What follows is an action spectacular, made for the big screen. This is old-school film-making, direct from the 70's and 80's, given a slight buff and polish by the techniques of today.
Fundamentally Fury Road is a two hour car chase, utilising a plethora of different motor-cars - from monster trucks to buggies, motor-cycles to long haul behemoths. For the petrol-heads out there, this is an unimaginable feast of pistons, manifolds and exhausts. For the rest of us, it's a visual treat, where by the more attractive vehicles of yesteryear have been mounted a top these denizens of smoke and steel!

Fury Road is an action movie utilising expert stunt-work and choreography. There's certainly some digital mastery at work here, but what Fury Road proves indisputably is live action stunt-work and (specifically) the chaos and random acts of human interaction can not be duplicated by computers to the fullest extent. Perhaps the mere fact we're human is the reason we can distinguish between the two?

A testosterone-fuelled action flick Fury Road might be, but despite Hardys nuanced performance, the film belongs to the women. Theron is stunning and captivating as Furiosa - a woman whos agenda is furiously independent of her former leader. In her charge are similarly independent women (former brides of Joe). all looking for an oasis in the wasteland - which few believe even exist.

Once again, Fury Road is a classic cinematic experience. Despite the minimal plot, there is much to ponder - not least is a fully realised world which we're (frankly) all heading towards.
Miller has pulled out all the stops here. Along with his cast and crew he has produced a film which will be long remembered and oft-copied.
A follow-up is in the works. It'll be quite something to see Miller better his efforts here. The wasteland is ripe for exploration however and certainly worthy of revisiting!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://www.ollieboyd.com

Ex Machina


Ex Machina is the directorial debut of Alex Garland. Having made an early career as a novelist (The Beach, The Tesseract, The Coma), Garland adapted The Beach for director Danny Boyle. This relationship was obviously a good one, as it spawned several other collaborations for the pair, including 28 Days Later and Sunshine.
Establishing himself as a significant screenwriter, Garland went on to write Never Let Me Go and Dredd. Directing seems the next logical step for this talented writer, who employs distinctive themes with each project.

Caleb Smith (Domhnall Gleeson) is a computer programmer working for Bluebook. We meet Caleb early on and are subject to his winning of an in-house competition to spend a week with Nathan Bateman (Oscar Isaac) - Calebs boss and head of Bluebook.
Rather than head to the top floor of his building, Caleb is flown to an undisclosed location, where Nathan works in isolation on classified projects.

Calebs destination is hidden and secretive, yet clearly well financed and self-sufficient. We're soon introduced to Nathan. A middle-aged academic with an assured sense of self-discipline.
It would appear this competition is an opportunity for Caleb to pick the brains of a billionaire CEO, witnessing first hand the benefits of creating the code for a successful search engine at the tender age of thirteen (as is the case with Nathan).

Nathan is seen exercising and eating well throughout the films duration. Nathan likes his alcohol too, but as each new day dawns he is never idle.
From Calebs perspective Nathan is a formidable individual, who demands respect. In contrast, Caleb might be good at his job, but is presented as an inferior man, clearly ill at ease with his isolated surrounds. This is a purposeful dynamic which puts both Caleb and the audience on the back foot.

After presenting Ava to Caleb (a significant step forward in the world of artificial intelligence), Nathan puts forward a scintillating challenge. In an effort to distinguish the full extent of Avas capabilities, Nathan would like Caleb to give Ava the Turing Test - a test conceived by Alan Turing to distinguish true, independent thought.

Ava is a fully functional female robot. She is beautiful and inquisitive - fascinated by the sudden appearance of Caleb. The Turing test begins resulting in significant data - all appears to be going well. The laboratory suffers random power failures however - the problem never isolated or solved. The power fails several times during Caleb and Avas interviews, leading Ava to disclose secrets about Nathans full intentions.
Without warning Garland has thrust us into a game of cat and mouse - and robot! Both human and artificial relationships are put to the test. Manipulate(e) and manipulator befall each of the principle players.

Despite the single local and minimal cast (Nathan has a single assistant named Kyoko), Ex Machina is incredibly captivating, with the claustrophobic environs adding much to the mounting tension.
Ex Machina is a terrific addition to the robot/A.I. sub-genre. Garalnd has devised and executed a stylish and taught drama. A thought provoking sci-fi which brings questions about our humanity and it's future to the fore. Along with Blomkamps Chappie, Ex Machina looks at consciousness within the digital realm - and the implications of it's existence.

If our betters exist by our own design then where does humanity go from here?!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://insidetherockposterframe.blogspot.com.au
Illustration by Jock

Saturday 30 May 2015

It Follows


Spoiler Alert!

Original and terrifying, It Follows gives us an entity with many faces - a curse to be bestowed upon one, transferable through sex. Horror films have often utilised a sexually transmitted conceit - playing on our fears of real-world sexual contraction. Taking a subtler approach with It Follows, the film-makers have successfully given us a parable which stays long in the memory.

Written and directed by David Robert Mitchell, It Follows begins with one such victim of the curse running scared around suburbia, evading an invisible (to the audience at least) entity. By the end of the opening act, we discover the fate which awaits all who come into contact with the curse.

Shortly there after we're introduced to Jay (Maika Monroe), a high-school graduate with a close group of friends - sweet on a guy who she's prepared to take the next step with. Before you can yell, "Steer clear, girl!", the deed is done! Awaking from a chloroform attack, Jay finds herself tied to a wheelchair, with her lovely new beau explaining what's gonna happen to her next. A naked woman soon approaches, intent on chasing Jay down (all be it at a creepily slow pace). Despite bestowing an horrific curse on her, Jays new fella decides to give her the heads-up on her bedevilled new existence (bless him)!

Suitably shocked but less than convinced, Jay returns to her friends and family and continues on her path. Before long another ghostly figure approaches (a former victim perhaps?). After several disturbing encounters, Jay tracks down her former lay, along with her friends to discover more.
Various things are learnt, not least is the fact that others who contract the curse and pass it on are a link in an ever-expanding chain - accountable and in danger, should the curse find it's way back to them. What follows are various attempts at out-manoeuvring and out-smarting this perpetual menace.

After a fantastic build and various inventive encounters with the antagonist(s), the final act is a little too subtle for its own good. The formula of ridding the curse by passing it on is repeated once too often and the final denouement is unclear (there's a suggestion that the curse has been passed to a prostitute or two)? Ultimately our main protagonist (Jay) continues on with her life - new boyfriend and fellow curse(y) in toe. One has to assume that together they are living with the curse - supporting one another, as many victims of sexually incurable disease the world over have to do.

It Follows is a great little horror movie with a fantastic premise. David Robert Mitchell, along with his cast and crew have brought sexually transmitted infection to the fore once again. These issues continue to be relevant and will hopefully spark conversation (and dare I say it, action)! Interestingly there's no mention of contraception throughout the films entirety - surely this would have made for an interesting plot device, if nothing else? The fact that it's been jettisoned altogether is a tad irresponsible to my mind.

Dour though the ending might be, It Follows proves once again that you don't need blood and guts or even digital effects to scare an audience. More often its those primal fears which concern us most. Mistakes made in the heat of passion and the inevitability of our own demise continue to be foremost on our minds!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: https://uk.pinterest.com

Friday 29 May 2015

Avengers: Age of Ultron


The sequel to the biggest super-hero movie of all time is here! With all the principles of the first adventure returning (Joss Whedon in-particular), Age of Ultron arrives with high expectations - and it doesn't disappoint!

Beginning with an assault on a HYDRA base, Age of Ultron sees our heroes cleaning up the SHIELD/HYDRA debacle after the events of The Winter Soldier. Tony Stark is determined to prevent any possible threat which may lie ahead - particularly after having the proverbial carpet pulled from under him and the rest of the Avengers.
Not content with building a number of Iron Man suits, Stark has since been tinkering with drones (of a kind), in an effort to keep the world safe - covering more ground than the Avengers ever could. Starks next step is to give the drones independent thought - in effect creating artificial intelligence. With Dr Banner on side, Stark goes about putting his plans into action - absolving the task of the Avengers forever.

Not all goes as planned however, with Starks experiment birthing the villainous Ultron. With the history of man at his disposable (thank you internet), Ultron comes to the realisation that should humans be saved, they will not be safe from themselves - thusly we should all be wiped from the face of the planet!
So begins a plan by Ultron (free to travel from Starks drones to HYDRAs drones, improving upon them incrementally) to rid man from this Earth.

Meanwhile two orphans, who have grown to hate Stark (as a result of his former weaponry dealings) seek Ultron out. Pietro and Wanda Maximoff are twins who have been experimented on by Baron Von Strucker (of HYDRA fame). They have the power of speed and the power of psychic manipulation respectively.
Ultron uses the twins powers to great effect, disorientating our team of heroes. One of the highlights of the movie sees our team independently second-guessing themselves, immersed in vivid dreams and nightmares. More so than the opening "splash-page" of the HYDRA assault, these sequences bring some classic Marvel imagery to life - not least is the decimation of the Avengers, as seen through Starks eyes.

Despite some chilling imagery and a serious threat to avenge, Age of Ultron is a lot of fun! One could argue that the film is funnier than most comedies of late! Of course with Joss Whedon at the helm (and chief writer to boot) this is hardly surprising. DC are gonna be hard-pressed to trump Marvel with their seemingly dark/serious approach.
The humour in the Marvel Universe is absolutely essential - making every tale of good triumphing over evil a distinguishable one (see also: thoroughly entertaining)! All the boxes have been ticked in this new adventure, but the humour will be the primary ingredient remembered!

Another notable ingredient this time is the sheer expansiveness of the Marvel-verse. Since Iron Man in 2008 the Marvel universe has been growing larger with each subsequent adventure. Age of Ultron never pauses for scintillating breath - truly delivering on an ever increasing cross-pollination of characters. Along with the Avengers, we have appearances from Falcon and War Machine, the aforementioned twins (Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch) and the creation of a further hero. A welcome addition to the Marvel-verse, sporting the dulcet tones of Paul Bettany (formerly Starks super computer, Jarvis).

With events in full swing, Age of Ultron also offers some tantalising hints at what's to come. Despite his willingness to do good, Stark treads on quite a few toes in this adventure, giving credence to the upcoming Civil War tale - cracks in the team are indeed visible! Trouble is a foot in Asgard for Thor and the power of the Infinity Stones are further realised - the Infinity War is coming yo!!

Marvel have done it yet again with Age of Ultron. Joss Whedon, his cast and crew have surpassed themselves, delivering a thrilling yarn with spectacle-a-plenty. Each character is given their chance to shine. No one is left-out or forgotten - a team effort indeed!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://www.hypable.com

Tuesday 5 May 2015

Fast and the Furious 7


Two years ago I reviewed Fast 6 on this very blog. With Fast 5 a watershed moment in this series, I had high hopes for the sixth instalment. It didn't disappoint and has in fact improved with each subsequent viewing.
Fast 5 is still the benchmark for me - making the impossible appear possible, in terms of effects work and stunts (a thrilling story helped no end)! To my mind Fast 6 veered over that line. Things started to appear less believable, relinquishing the investment audiences had made with Toretto and company. Subsequently the fate of Toretto and his team became more inconsequential.

Well, Fast 7 makes the previous entry look almost documentary-like in it's execution! I caught the Road Runner Movie on television the other day (hilarious) and after seeing Fast 7, I can say with some certainty that the two share more with one another than any previous Fast and the Furious entry!

Fast 7 comes with high hopes of course (the least of which is the integrity of the series I'm sure). At the forefront of most peoples minds will be the passing of Paul Walker and the completion of said film without one of it's leads.
The bulk of these questions and more fell at the feet of new director James Wan - a substantial change from long-time director of the series Justin Lin.
Known for his horror output over the last eleven years (Saw, Insidious, The Conjuring), Wan was a left-field choice, but an assured one.
Keen to stretch his repertoire perhaps, Wan has fully embraced the aesthetic of the series. The giant title is indicative of Wans recent output, but everything else is glistening chrome and glistening flesh - accompanied by an R&B/Hip-Hop infused soundtrack and enough sharp, quick edits to keep even the casual viewer captivated.

Fast 7 sees Owen Shaw (from episode 6) hospitalised and crippled - with his brother Deckard (the Stath) out for revenge. After visiting his brother, Deckard goes about acquiring information on Torettos whereabouts. His first stop is the DSS offices of Los Angeles and the computer of one Luke Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson) - big mistake!
Deckard and Hobbs go head to head in one of the best scenes, which goes some way to establishing the Looney Tunes-esque nature of this instalment. Surely one punch from Johnsons tree trunk-like arms would kill most men?!

Once Shaw is loose from Hobbs grasp, he's hot on the heels of Toretto and his gang. Hobbs does what he can to land some help at Torettos feet in the form of a deal. This particular deal comes from Mr Nobody (Kurt Russell), a government spook on the trail of some stolen technology.
The McGuffin this time is the Gods Eye - a headache-inducing piece of equipment, which can search the globe for a specific individual, utilising the personal tech of the planets population. Buy more phones people - lets make this thing a reality (if it isn't already of course)!
In exchange for retrieving this device, Mr Nobody will help locate Deckard Shaw and further help Toretto bring him to justice.
Hence forth a series of increasingly ridiculous set-pieces to get the blood pumping!

A lot of the fun of Fast 7 (not to mention the rest of the series) comes with the acknowledgement of cast and crew at the absurdity of the events unfolding. A good portion of this series has been executed with tongue firmly in cheek, leaving little doubt that all involved are having a blast!
The producers of this series believe bigger is better and so far they've not been wrong. I stand by my belief that a return to a slightly more grounded adventure would benefit this series greatly. Lets get clever with these characters before an adventure on Mars ensues!

Talking of grounded, the end of Fast 7 is handled with great sensitivity. With Walkers passing in mind, Toretto (Diesel) leads a fond farewell to his fallen brother - allowing for both Walker and the character of Brian to live on in film-land.
The fact that this little sequence has the ability to bring a tear to the eye should further demonstrate the expertise this team brings to the Fast franchise. There's no question they know exactly what they're doing. Here's to Fast 8 in a year or so!

3/5


Poster image courtesy: http://hnnblogs.com

Monday 4 May 2015

Top Five


Top Five is the third feature from comedian/writer/director Chris Rock. It's a rom-com of sorts, undoubtedly pooling from Rocks own personal experiences.

Rock plays Andre Allen, a successful comedian with a feature-film career. Allen is accompanied by Chelsea Brown (Rosario Dawson) on a press tour to promote his latest opus, Uprize (the first dramatic retelling of the Haitian uprising of 1791). Chelsea is a journalist from the New York Times interviewing Allen for a feature.
Chelsea is our window into Allens life and her subsequent interview helps us learn of Allens past, present and future.

Allens story is the classic rags to riches tale (up to and including the inevitable creative impasse).
Rock is telling the story of the comedian here. An all too familiar story beginning with the creative freedom of the past, which walked hand in hand with obscurity (later notoriety). Then with commercial success comes compromise - the arch-nemesis to creativity! Ultimately commitment and responsibility befall our once and future king - with the need to keep those around him fed and watered.
So many of our heros (particularly comedians) appear to struggle to recapture the energy and originality of their youth. Rather than embrace their age and adapt, they often play it safe with projects so broad, they may hit with box office receipts but they too often miss creatively. Comfortable and secure in their privileged surrounds, the desire to rock the boat is long gone. Interesting how the very same risks and bombast they took in their youth can signify career suicide years later?!

Rock covers all of the above and more in Top Five - much of which can be measured by Allens romantic entanglements. With a marriage to Americas, reality-television sweetheart on the calender, Chelsea represents a romantic gamble. Chelsea seeks the truth from Allen and doesn't shy away from asking the tough questions.
Being in the limelight as Allen has all these years, we learn the truth of his past indiscretions. These flashbacks break-up the conversation between Allen and Chelsea nicely. Full of physical comedy, they are genuinely funny and further help form the put-upon character of Allen.

Reminiscent of Richard Linklater and Woody Allen before him, Top Five is a fly on the wall account of two people getting to know one another, via witty and engaging repartee - with the streets of New York their backdrop.

Interestingly Top Five brings to light a lot of the same themes as Birdman (they would make for a great double-feature). While Birdman took more of an insular look at it's subject, Top Five looks outward at the trappings of fame and celebrity. Together they create a grand expose on the power of stardom, both good and bad.

Lest we forget, these are first-world problems these characters are facing, but problems never the less. Both films acknowledge this with an infectious smile and a vulnerable heart - exactly how the free world should face all their problems really!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://www.reddit.com

Sunday 5 April 2015

Chappie


Chappie is the new film from Neill Blomkamp, director of District 9 and Elysium. In 2009 Blomkamp exploded on to the scene with a signature style and has employed many of the same techniques and themes since.
Firstly Blomkamps films look incredible! The design of everything is so clearly considered and the visual effects are exquisite! The atmosphere he generates is often clinical tech meets grungy ghetto - a dynamic visual aesthetic which draws parallels with the inequality in his stories.
Steeped in technology and science fiction, Blomkamps films often display contemporary parables such as environmental and political concerns. With District 9 Blomkamp and co-writer Terri Tatchell (Blomkamps wife) nailed this tantalising mix of visuals and commentary. Elysium came close, but fell short - offering a sentimental, but ultimately devastating answer to an over-populated planet, whose inhabitants could be cured of all disease?! Regardless, a disappointing Blomkamp film will always be an interesting and dynamic vision.

With Chappie, Blomkamp has returned to his home-town of Johannesburg - the setting for District 9. He has also employed the talents of his former writing partner (Tatchell) to bring some joy to proceedings - something missing from the more serious Elysium, which Blomkamp tackled alone.

The police of Johannesburg are overwhelmed with crime. In an effort to protect the people and the police, robots (named Scouts) have been developed by leading manufacturers, Tetra Vaal - designed by chief engineer, Deon Wilson (Dev Patel).
Scout #22 is emobilised in a Police altercation and is consequently decommissioned. Not content with merely programming robots to do a humans biding, Deon is close to developing an artificial intelligence. Using the now defunct scout #22 as his guinea pig, Deon sets about uploading a newly conceived consciousness.
Meanwhile gang in-fighting has cost Ninja and Yolandi a debt of 20 million (rand). Their plan is to use a police scout to help them "raise" the money they need with a planned robbery.
Enter Chappie - Deons experiment and Ninja and Yolandis answer to a life-threatening debt.

Chappie has come in for heavy criticism for being derivative of other robot and AI films. Yes the opening salvo of a crime-ridden city and an overburdened police force is reminiscent of Robocop. But then the metamorphosis of man to alien in District 9 was reminiscent of Cronenbergs The Fly. This kind of criticism serves little to no purpose when you consider most stories have already been told. In this day and age, it's how one spins a yarn, both technically and emotionally.

Chappie does both very well! Once again the film looks breathtaking! Joining Dev Patel is Hugh Jackman, as competing design engineer Vincent Moore and Sigourney Weaver, as Michelle Bradley - the pairs boss and CEO of Tetra Vaal. In reality Ninja and Yolandi are Johannesburg musical legends, Die Antwoord. Here they play criminalised versions of themselves - and Chappies newly adoptive parents (how's that for originality)!
And in a motion-capture performance to rival Serkis and co is the great Sharlto Copley as Chappie - Blomkamps lucky charm! Sharlto is magnificent and hilarious! His performance is child-like, but subtly adaptive - as Chappie learns at an increasingly fast rate. Just as he did in District 9, Copley totally convinces as Chappie, owning every line of dialogue (instantly quotable I might add)!

Despite similarities to other films, Chappie looks at advancement and new frontiers in technology. With consciousness comes a barrage of questions, not least is ones own mortality. Blomkamp looks at man and creator parables this time - using Chappie to ask questions which are foremost on our minds. Wisely the human factor has not been forgotten in Blomkamps imminent future. There is potential for conscious over-load down the line and more uneasy questions to an over-populated planet.
Until such a follow-up arrives, there is much to enjoy with Chappie. Not least is a loveable central character, engaging story and visuals to stimulate the senses long after the credits have rolled.

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://www.film.ru

Kingsman: The Secret Service


Kingsman: The Secret Service is brought to us by the same team behind Kick-Ass. Just as Kick-Ass was conceived by comic-book writer Mark Millar, so too was The Secret Service.
Having established a good working relationship with Kick-Ass, Matthew Vaughn was on-board early with The Secret Service, acting as co-plotter on the comic-book series.
Comic books are being mined left and right within the film industry. With The Secret Service, it was a parallel process of comic series and film adaptation being brought simultaneously to life. The result (for all those who have read the series) is a looser adaptation than the aforementioned Kick-Ass (a series which had already completed it's first arc).
The plot and major beats of the comic-book are intact, however many details have been altered. From a creative perspective it's fascinating to discover what's been retained and what's been jettisoned.

Like Kick-Ass, Kingsman is to spy films what Kick-Ass was to super-hero films. An edgy take on the sub-genre, which takes place in reality (or a very close approximation). Nods to previous entries to the genre are peppered throughout, with both protagonist and antagonist playing to and against expectation (Millars calling card).
Despite being the original co-plotter, one imagines many of the alterations came from Vaughn and co-writer Jane Goldman. Vaughn is a self-proclaimed Bond aficionado. Like many a Bond film, Kingsman features; a larger than life villain (complete with hidden base);colourful henchmen; women in peril; and gadgets a plenty. And in Colin Firth, Vaughn has found a terrific Bond parable!

Kingsman is no spoof however. Very much it's own entity, Kingsman pays homage to it's inspiration - a far more respectful approach than sending up the genre completely. The devilish plot from entrepreneur and chief villain Valentine for example, is chillingly poignant. This viable threat was present in the comic-book also, emphasising what fans already know. More than just sugary super-hero fare, comic-books are a significant art-form, spreading (among other things) political and cultural concerns!

Colin Firths character, Galahad is mentor to Eggsy (Taron Egerton), the son of Galahads previous protege. Eggsy has grown up amongst the council tenements of London, living off welfare and committing petty crimes with his direction-less friends. A Kingsman replacement is needed just as Eggsy is charged with grand theft auto. A tradition of the Kingsman is to pull potential recruits into the fold. Seeing great potential in him, Galahad volunteers Eggsy - absolving him of his crimes and bringing him to task, alongside a handful of young upstarts.
Eggsy is our window into the world of the Kingsman, as he and the other recruits are put through their paces until a clear winner emerges.

Kingsman: The Secret Service is great fun! It wears it's references on it's sleeve and subtly becomes the film it so clearly adores (in much the same way Spike Jonzes Adaptation did).
A formidable partnership has emerged with Kingsman (and Kick-Ass before it). Millar and Vaughn are populists making entertainment for themselves fundamentally. This skewed reality of theirs takes no prisoners. Some may argue that it's gratuitous or even crass. In this age of great power and great responsibility however, Millar and Vaughn respect their audience enough to take responsibility for themselves!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://theilliteratereader.com

Birdman


Birdman triumphed at the Oscars this year, winning best film and best director. My vote for best film would've been American Sniper, but Birdmans director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu is certainly deserved of recognition.
Emerging from his native Mexico with Amores Perros 15 years ago, Inarritu went on to achieve worldwide acclaim with his next two films, alongside writing partner Guillermo Arriaga. Subsequent years have seen him break away from Arriaga with films such as Biutiful and this years Birdman.

Inarritu makes films about the human condition, almost documentary-like in their execution. Each of Inarritus films is a close personal account of his subject, oozing visceral intimacy. Much beauty can be found in Inarritus films, but they are often joyless affairs, siding heavily on the dramatic. Well, Inarritu is set to break that trend with the hilarious Birdman!

Set on Broadway in contemporary New York, Birdman follows actor, Riggan Thomson (Michael Keaton) on a quest to rediscover his craft and ultimately find meaning for his tired existence. Having established himself as a viable commercial entity with three Birdman films, Riggan is keen to shed the burden of his former super-hero persona. Riggan has chosen to direct and star in an adaptation of a Raymond Carver short story. Thought of as a left-field choice by his peers and critics (and a clichéd one at that), Riggan is keen to rise above the naysayers and produce something of significant artistic merit.

Birdman is Hollywood meets Broadway, with many of the actors at odds with themselves and their profession. The film buzzes with anxiety, as each star is driven to justify their existence on the stage. Michael Keaton is fabulous in the lead and carries the film exceedingly well. Having played Batman in real life, casting Keaton is a no-brainer - a master stroke, emphasising life imitating art parables.
Keaton is supported by a fantastic cast who all play upon their current notoriety, projected by a contemporary Hollywood. Edward Norton is the stand-out as the notoriously difficult Mike Shiner. We even find Naomi Watts experimenting with her female co-star in a great riff on her break-out role (Mulholland Drive).

It's interesting to see a film like Birdman do so well. It could so easily have been misconstrued as Hollywood massaging the egos of the elite, with a wry declaration of their official standing. It's fascinating to think there's an audience outside of Hollywood for this kind of movie. It says much about a society when we each know more about the celebrities and stars who surround us than we do our closest friends.

Despite the satiric nature of Birdman, the film looks deeper into the psyche of the artist - the creator. Specifically, Birdman looks at the justification for art and creativity, despite ones age and previous success. The creator creates - they don't stop.
The tortured artist is present here - a cliché perhaps, but no less a fact. Riggan is both his own worst critic and biggest supporter. As he goes about channelling his ideas to the stage, he is tripped-up and second-guessed by everyone in his company, not least by his biggest adversary - himself!
In an effort to overcome his anxieties, Riggan puts his best foot forward and produces something truly dynamic. Importantly Riggan recognises that art is paramount. The praise and accolades are inconsequential next to his performance and his production.

There's a point in Birdman which could easily have represented the end of the film. A further five minutes or so exceeds it. There's the suggestion that Riggan is mad (or psychologically unwell at least) and in a lightness of touch, Inarritu sees to it that his leads sanity is restored. It's suitably quirky but unnecessary in my opinion. It belittles the length and pains of Riggans journey.

Birdman is an intense warts 'n' all look at an artist in the midst of creation. The film could just as easily be about a painter or a musician. In a further twist of life imitating art, Birdman looks at the most commercial, most viable of artists - the Hollywood star!

4/5


Poster image courtesy: http://www.laweekly.com